Online Fraud and Scams


Read our latest Fraud Alert to learn about how to protect yourself from Online Fraud and Scams that are surfacing.


It's so easy to become a victim. It can happen fast. Before you know it, you've clicked "send" or put your money in the mail and you're out hundreds or even thousands of dollars.


Scam artists work full-time at ripping you off. And after one scam bites the dust, the scam artists are ready with another one. It's no wonder so many people fall for the next generation scam. Write your experience, report fraud!

Gary Caplan — Ontario, Canada

Gary Caplan lawyer Fraudulently Misrepresenting FOOL-ITIS! Gary Caplan – Mason Caplan Roti LLP Gary Caplan Partner Direct: (416) 596-7796 Direct Fax: (855) 880-6271 gcaplan@mcr.law

Gary Caplan lawyer Fraudulently Misrepresenting FOOL-ITIS! Gary Caplan – Mason Caplan Roti LLP Gary Caplan Partner Direct: (416) 596-7796 Direct Fax: (855) 880-6271 gcaplan@mcr.law Gary Caplan lawyer Fraudulently Misrepresenting FOOL-ITIS! Gary Caplan – Mason Caplan Roti LLP Gary Caplan Partner Direct: (416) 596-7796 Direct Fax: (855) 880-6271 gcaplan@mcr.law

The strange case of “Kurios Foulidis” and Mr. Caplan

Court file no. CV-09-373099-0000 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

A Faustian Demise Awaits Mephistopheles on the Boardwalk.

The plaintiff claims against the defendant, George Foulidis for general and special damages for fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy to defraud, inducing breach of contract in the amount of ten million dollars ($10,000,000.00)!

The plaintiff William Malamas is a registered real estate broker, a builder and developer. The defendant George Foulidis (“Foulidis”) is a resident of the City of Toronto. Foulidis is a restaurateur. (Owner, Beaches Boardwalk Café) Foulidis had established close relationships with several councillors from the City of Toronto who were using their influence to support Foulidis’ requests for amending or extending the lease, between Foulidis and the City, to suit Foulidis’ plans. The plaintiff and Foulidis were meeting in Foulidis’ restaurants, the one in the beaches and the other one at Woodbine Ave in Markham. The plaintiff did not know much about Foulidis other than that he was in the restaurant business, had close ties with the City of Toronto, got married at about 1994 and then had several children. The plaintiff, at about the end of November 2001, received, unexpectedly, a telephone call from Foulidis. Foulidis knew that the plaintiff could not afford to retain a lawyer in the litigation. The plaintiff pleads the fact is that Foulidis stated that, out of his desire to help the plaintiff, had spoken to a lawyer (Gary Caplan; McCague Borlack LLP) and, at his request, the lawyer had agreed to assist the plaintiff, without requiring an upfront retainer. Foulidis’ representation was false and/or was recklessly uncaring whether it was true or false. Foulidis: i) did not have a desire to help the plaintiff. Foulidis pretended that he wanted to help the plaintiff. ii) Mr. Caplan was not just a lawyer. Mr. Foulidis and Gary Caplan had an undisclosed intimate relationship. The plaintiff pleads and the fact is that Foulidis intended to convince the plaintiff to retain Caplan out of his knowledge and belief that Caplan would follow his directions in the course of the litigation and would lead the litigation to a result that would be beneficial to Foulidis. Mr. Garry Caplan, in a discussion with the plaintiff in Caplan’s office, admitted of his intimate relationship with Mr. George Fouldis. Caplan said: “George (Fouldis) made me feel so good. I’ll do anything for George (Fouldis).”

IT IS FLABBERGASTING TO NOTICE THAT NO ONE IN THE MEDIA IS COVERING THIS!

Post Your Story NOW!

5 / 5. 1

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

5
(1)
1

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This website is protected by RSFirewall!